DC Fire & Security logoDC Fire & Security
Fire Safety Compliance — Expert Guide

Types of Fire Risk Assessment: Type 1 to Type 4 Explained

By the DC Fire & Security engineering team — installing and maintaining fire and security systems since 2010. Updated June 2026.

SSAIB CCTV, Intruder Alarm & Access Control Certificated
Fast Response Times
15+ Years Experience
500+ Commercial Clients

Quick answer

The four FRA types apply to residential blocks: Type 1 (common parts, non-destructive — the default), Type 2 (common parts, destructive sampling — where construction defects are suspected), Type 3 (adds flats, non-destructive), Type 4 (common parts and flats, destructive — the deepest look). Most blocks need Type 1 routinely, escalating types when findings or history demand. Workplaces use standard (untyped) FRAs.

The four types, precisely

The typing applies to residential blocks (PAS 79-2 territory and the housing guidance lineage); workplace FRAs are simply FRAs — scoped by premises, not typed. Type 2/4's destructive sampling overlaps compartmentation survey practice — coordinated commissioning (one opening-up programme serving both) is the procurement win our combined surveys deliver.

TypeScopeDestructive?When commissioned
Type 1Common parts onlyNoThe routine default for blocks — regular cycle
Type 2Common partsYes — sampling opens constructionDefect suspicion: compartmentation doubts, cladding-era scrutiny, pre-purchase depth
Type 3Common parts + sample flatsNoConcerns spanning demise lines: alarms in flats, flat entrance doors, conversion histories
Type 4Common parts + flatsYesThe full forensic: serious defect history, post-incident, safety-case evidence

Choosing the type your block needs

Decision logic agents and RMCs can apply: routine cycles on maintained purpose-built blocks → Type 1 (annual-to-triennial per risk profile, the review-frequency wisdom); conversion-era buildings, unexplained alarm histories, or flat-door/in-flat provision questions → Type 3's sampling across demise lines; construction-integrity doubts (works history, cladding adjacency, survey findings, insurer/lender pressure) → Type 2's opening-up; and accumulation of the above, safety-case building under the Building Safety Act, or post-incident reconstruction → Type 4. Escalation is evidence-led: Type 1 findings naming suspicions ('riser penetrations unverifiable — recommend Type 2 sampling') are the system working. What typing never changes: the legal requirement is suitable-and-sufficient assessment — typing calibrates sufficiency to building reality (the responsible-person duties guide carries the legal frame).

Costs, access and coordination

Pricing shape by type: Type 1 from the standard bands (£300–£700 typical small-mid blocks); Type 3 adds flat-sampling logistics (appointment cycles per the access realities — £500–£1,200 ranges); Types 2/4 price with opening-up and making-good (£1,000–£3,000+ by sampling scope — coordinated with compartmentation survey economics where both are wanted; the combined programmes we quote merge them). Access choreography dominates elapsed time on 3/4 (resident notices, sampling consent, the best-endeavours documentation habits), and making-good standards decide reputations (Type 2/4 firms are judged by their patching — photograph everything, ours included). Output expectations rise with type: action plans referencing opened evidence, photographic schedules, and safety-case-grade documentation at Type 4 (the golden-thread expectations from our Building Safety Act work). Commission types deliberately, escalate on evidence, and coordinate intrusive work once — blocks that drift into serial partial surveys pay for the same risers thrice.

Frequently Asked Questions

Our managing agent ordered 'an FRA' — which type did we get?
Almost certainly Type 1 (the unstated default). The report should say — and if your block has conversion history or defect questions, the typing conversation is worth having explicitly.
How often should Type 1 FRAs repeat?
Risk-profiled: annual reviews with reassessment cycles 1–3 years typical for blocks (and on triggers — works, incidents, occupancy change per the review guide). Higher-risk buildings compress cycles.
Is Type 4 required for Building Safety Act safety cases?
Not nominally — but safety cases demand evidence Type 1 paper can't supply, so Type 2/4 depth (or equivalent compartmentation survey evidence) becomes the practical path for HRBs (the safety-case guide develops this).
Can flats refuse access for Type 3/4 sampling?
Cooperation-first with lease access provisions behind — the flat-door checking playbook's best-endeavours documentation applies. Sampling designs flex around refusals; systematic refusal itself becomes a finding.

Need help from a professional installer?

We install and maintain fire and security systems across Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and London — with fixed written quotes, a 36-month warranty, and certification your insurer will accept.

Request a free survey

Free site visit · No obligation · Response within 24 hours

Photos of the door, panel, alarm, camera position or problem area help us quote more accurately. More details means less guessing and a faster response.

No spam. We'll only use these details to respond to your enquiry.

24-hour response
SSAIB-certificated for CCTV, intruder alarms and access control
500+ commercial clients