DC Fire & Security logoDC Fire & Security
Access Control & Door Entry — Expert Guide

Salto vs Paxton: Wireless Locks or Wired Doors?

By the DC Fire & Security engineering team — installing and maintaining fire and security systems since 2010. Updated June 2026.

SSAIB CCTV, Intruder Alarm & Access Control Certificated
Fast Response Times
15+ Years Experience
500+ Commercial Clients

Quick answer

They solve different door problems: Paxton excels at wired perimeter and high-traffic doors with real-time control; Salto's battery-powered escutcheons make dozens of interior doors affordable (no cabling per door). Hotels, universities and heritage buildings go Salto-heavy; offices and multi-tenant blocks go Paxton-first. Mixed estates — Paxton perimeter, Salto interiors — are increasingly the grown-up answer.

The architectural difference that drives everything

Paxton doors are wired: controller, PSU, lock, reader, cables — real-time events, remote release, no batteries, costed per the Net2 guide (£500–£900/door). Salto doors are self-contained: the escutcheon (handle-reader-lock in one) runs on batteries, holding permissions locally and updating through the SVN network (data riding on credentials between wired update points) or BLUEnet wireless — £400–£700 fitted with near-zero cabling. Consequences: Salto's per-door economics transform interior estates (20 doors wired = cabling project; 20 escutcheons = an afternoon each), while wired doors retain the edge for instant lockdown, heavy traffic and harsh/exterior conditions. Neither 'wins' — door types do.

Where each dominates

  • Salto-heavy estates: hotels (the sector it conquered), student accommodation, universities, care settings (privacy + audit per room), heritage interiors (no cable chases — pairs with our listed-building methods), co-working hot-office churn
  • Paxton-heavy estates: SME offices (handful of doors, wired simplicity), multi-tenant blocks with intercom integration, industrial perimeters, anywhere lockdown-speed and remote release matter most
  • The mixed pattern (our common recommendation): Paxton on perimeter/fire-critical/high-traffic doors + Salto escutcheons across interiors — one credential (DESFire carries both), each architecture where it's strongest
  • Audit/real-time nuance: wired = instant events; Salto SVN = events upload at update points (BLUEnet closes the gap wirelessly) — compliance-driven estates check this against their needs
  • Battery logistics: Salto's honest tax — 1–2 year cycles, low-battery warnings, planned rounds (we fold them into maintenance); wired doors' tax is the cabling you already paid

Costs and decision discipline

Money side-by-side: 10 interior doors — Salto ~£4,500–£6,500 total vs wired Paxton ~£5,500–£8,500 with cabling disruption; 3 exterior doors — Paxton ~£1,700–£2,500 vs Salto exterior-rated units similar but with battery/positioning caveats. Platform costs: Salto's software/licensing tiers (KS cloud per-door subscriptions vs Space on-prem) against Paxton's licence-free Net2/licensed Paxton10 — 5-year modelling per the platforms guide settles it per estate. Decision shortcuts: count cable-hard interior doors (Salto's case builds past ~6–8); name your lockdown requirement honestly (wired wins seconds); check fire-door certification on escutcheon choices for fire doors (rated furniture exists — specify, per the fire-door hardware logic); and pilot one floor before estate rollout — both ecosystems expand gracefully, which is the luxury of choosing well-supported platforms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are Salto battery locks secure enough for exterior doors?
Exterior-rated Salto hardware exists and serves; harsh/high-attack perimeters still favour wired locks' power and monitoring. Our mixed-estate pattern reflects exactly that split.
What happens when a Salto battery dies?
Weeks of warnings precede it; emergency credential/PPD tools open dead-lock scenarios; planned rounds prevent them. Battery anxiety is mostly unfamiliarity — managed estates barely notice.
Can Salto and Paxton share one fob?
Yes with DESFire credentials carrying both applications — one fob, two systems, invisible to users. We commission this pattern regularly in mixed estates.
Which is better for a 40-room care home?
Typically Salto interiors (resident room privacy/audit, no corridor cabling) + Paxton/wired perimeter and fire-critical doors — with fire-rated furniture and release integration throughout (care settings' non-negotiables). Survey-led, as ever.

Need help from a professional installer?

We install and maintain fire and security systems across Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and London — with fixed written quotes, a 36-month warranty, and certification your insurer will accept.

Request a free survey

Free site visit · No obligation · Response within 24 hours

No spam. We'll only use these details to respond to your enquiry.

Want us to quote for remedials or any other works? Email your specifications or requirements to info@dcsecurity.co.uk — the inbox is monitored daily.

24-hour response
SSAIB-certificated for CCTV, intruder alarms and access control
500+ commercial clients