DC Fire & Security logoDC Fire & Security
Access Control & Door Entry — Expert Guide

Salto vs Paxton: Wireless Locks or Wired Doors?

By the DC Fire & Security engineering team — installing and maintaining fire and security systems since 2010. Updated June 2026.

SSAIB CCTV, Intruder Alarm & Access Control Certificated
Fast Response Times
15+ Years Experience
500+ Commercial Clients

Quick answer

They solve different door problems: Paxton excels at wired perimeter and high-traffic doors with real-time control; Salto's battery-powered escutcheons make dozens of interior doors affordable (no cabling per door). Hotels, universities and heritage buildings go Salto-heavy; offices and multi-tenant blocks go Paxton-first. Mixed estates — Paxton perimeter, Salto interiors — are increasingly the grown-up answer.

The architectural difference that drives everything

Paxton doors are wired: controller, PSU, lock, reader, cables — real-time events, remote release, no batteries, costed per the Net2 guide (£500–£900/door). Salto doors are self-contained: the escutcheon (handle-reader-lock in one) runs on batteries, holding permissions locally and updating through the SVN network (data riding on credentials between wired update points) or BLUEnet wireless — £400–£700 fitted with near-zero cabling. Consequences: Salto's per-door economics transform interior estates (20 doors wired = cabling project; 20 escutcheons = an afternoon each), while wired doors retain the edge for instant lockdown, heavy traffic and harsh/exterior conditions. Neither 'wins' — door types do.

Where each dominates

  • Salto-heavy estates: hotels (the sector it conquered), student accommodation, universities, care settings (privacy + audit per room), heritage interiors (no cable chases — pairs with our listed-building methods), co-working hot-office churn
  • Paxton-heavy estates: SME offices (handful of doors, wired simplicity), multi-tenant blocks with intercom integration, industrial perimeters, anywhere lockdown-speed and remote release matter most
  • The mixed pattern (our common recommendation): Paxton on perimeter/fire-critical/high-traffic doors + Salto escutcheons across interiors — one credential (DESFire carries both), each architecture where it's strongest
  • Audit/real-time nuance: wired = instant events; Salto SVN = events upload at update points (BLUEnet closes the gap wirelessly) — compliance-driven estates check this against their needs
  • Battery logistics: Salto's honest tax — 1–2 year cycles, low-battery warnings, planned rounds (we fold them into maintenance); wired doors' tax is the cabling you already paid

Costs and decision discipline

Money side-by-side: 10 interior doors — Salto ~£4,500–£6,500 total vs wired Paxton ~£5,500–£8,500 with cabling disruption; 3 exterior doors — Paxton ~£1,700–£2,500 vs Salto exterior-rated units similar but with battery/positioning caveats. Platform costs: Salto's software/licensing tiers (KS cloud per-door subscriptions vs Space on-prem) against Paxton's licence-free Net2/licensed Paxton10 — 5-year modelling per the platforms guide settles it per estate. Decision shortcuts: count cable-hard interior doors (Salto's case builds past ~6–8); name your lockdown requirement honestly (wired wins seconds); check fire-door certification on escutcheon choices for fire doors (rated furniture exists — specify, per the fire-door hardware logic); and pilot one floor before estate rollout — both ecosystems expand gracefully, which is the luxury of choosing well-supported platforms.

Frequently Asked Questions

Are Salto battery locks secure enough for exterior doors?
Exterior-rated Salto hardware exists and serves; harsh/high-attack perimeters still favour wired locks' power and monitoring. Our mixed-estate pattern reflects exactly that split.
What happens when a Salto battery dies?
Weeks of warnings precede it; emergency credential/PPD tools open dead-lock scenarios; planned rounds prevent them. Battery anxiety is mostly unfamiliarity — managed estates barely notice.
Can Salto and Paxton share one fob?
Yes with DESFire credentials carrying both applications — one fob, two systems, invisible to users. We commission this pattern regularly in mixed estates.
Which is better for a 40-room care home?
Typically Salto interiors (resident room privacy/audit, no corridor cabling) + Paxton/wired perimeter and fire-critical doors — with fire-rated furniture and release integration throughout (care settings' non-negotiables). Survey-led, as ever.

Need help from a professional installer?

We install and maintain fire and security systems across Bedfordshire, Hertfordshire and London — with fixed written quotes, a 36-month warranty, and certification your insurer will accept.

Request a free survey

Free site visit · No obligation · Response within 24 hours

Photos of the door, panel, alarm, camera position or problem area help us quote more accurately. More details means less guessing and a faster response.

No spam. We'll only use these details to respond to your enquiry.

24-hour response
SSAIB-certificated for CCTV, intruder alarms and access control
500+ commercial clients